Oh, Inverted World
Alia Ali
Posted on 12 March 2013
It wasn’t easy writing this. There was prejudice all around, from those who balked at the idea of an anti-queer musical without knowing what it was really about, to prejudice exhibited by the folks responsible for staging this (when I actually went to watch it), to the prejudice of my fellow audience members chuckling at the most non-PC jokes I’ve heard in recent years. So I’ll forgo a proper “introduction” and dive right in.
Asmara Songsang, written and directed by Rahman Adam, is about the lives of the LGBT community encapsulated into a neat little microcosm. Three friends, who identify themselves as Nazirah, Latipah and Karim, lead a gang of queer delinquents. Headquartered in a public park conveniently situated between neighborhood homes and the mosque, they throw raucous parties that last through the night, fuelled by really loud music, substance abuse and casual sexual encounters. This then incurs the wrath of the local religious leaders and the residents, who try their best to advise these lost souls and lead them to the path of righteousness. Along the way, a young under-aged girl (Nani) is pressured into joining their gang.

Nani, an innocent 14-year-old Muslim girl, is roped into “Kelab LGBT”. She is also tricked into having her tudung removed.
It is revealed that a major incentive for the gang’s behavior (aside from worldly thrills) is monetary rewards from their invisible “big boss”, who orders them to picket for the rights of LGBTs to be recognised and to trash public facilities. Nani enjoys the lifestyle at first, but later repents while singing a tearful ballad. Not allowed to return to her family, fights break out between the religious and the queer. Eventually, all the queers are struck dead by lightning, save for Nazirah, Latipah and Karim, who see the err of their ways and revert to being Nasir, Latip and Karimah. After a brief lecture on the hideous wrongs of not being heterosexual, everybody joins them on stage with Malaysian flags, singing a rousing rendition of a song dedicated to 1Malaysia.
[That lengthy synopsis was for the benefit of those who couldn’t make the performance (the tickets were free, thus ran out very quickly), and to simply lay out the numerous topics of the story that they managed to squeeze into a 90 minute play.]

The LGBT folks are rude and unrepentant when confronted by others on their behaviour.
First of all, the good points. There were some solid performances by the cast, especially the veterans. Dato’ Jalaluddin Hassan and Razak Ahmad were on point as stern ustazs, tutting with the poise of seasoned preachers. Radhi Khalid was my favorite – his Nazirah was by far the most confidently performed, especially Nazirah’s exasperation over having incompetent underlings. Kamal Adli stole the show for most of the audience with his well-timed comedic ad-libs as Jamal, the local youth leader.
The show was also pretty entertaining, if crass humor is your thing. Rahman Adam decided to use comedy to get the anti-LGBT message across (he wrote and directed recent comedy romp Man Sewel Datang KL), as he says that Malaysians don’t like heavy subjects. So to get the audience to listen to this important message, he wrapped it up in a musical comedy. And for the audience, it worked. (Almost) Everyone had a rollicking good time.
Now, the not-so-good points.
There was almost nothing from the LGBT’s side of the story that wasn’t hyperbolic, and there wasn’t a scene that wasn’t utterly condescending in nature.
Let’s call it what it is: this is an all-out propagandic play. If the people involved in this play want to rail against LGBTs, that’s fine. Really. Everybody has a right to say what they feel is right. But as wrong as they feel the idea of LGBTs is, they have an even more wrong idea of what being a non-heterosexual is like. Sure, they don’t fall into heteronormative roles, and that’s earth-shattering to plenty of people. But the research done was so poor — yet presented so conclusively. The queers were all heavily stereotyped into pengkids and bapoks from rich families, educated in the west. There was almost nothing from the LGBT’s side of the story that wasn’t hyperbolic, and there wasn’t a scene that wasn’t utterly condescending in nature.
In addition, the connection that “choosing to be gay” was part of a certain opposition party leader’s plan to topple the country’s morals and unity was forced and weak. All the LGBTs die and repent in the end and then rise to sing a 1Malaysia song? The actors themselves looked uncomfortable during the closing number, waving their flags perfunctorily.
Rahman Adam disclaims that funding was requested from and provided by Kementerian Penerangan, Komunikasi dan Kebudayaan, as part of his way of “doing something for the country”. Fair enough, since the message he wants to send and the message KPKK wants to send are aligned. I suppose a 1Malaysia ditty to drive the point of harmony home needed to be done. There was very little information I could find about the companies presenting this production, other than them being Thrive Edition (whose main business is pastries) and Azra Communciation.
Even if it wasn’t propagandic, there were too many troubling issues. The part that gets to me the most is that according to the playwright, all non-heterosexuals seem to belong to a club. Membership is declared by choosing whether they want to be an L, G, B or T, then a partner (or “baby LGBT” as they call it) for them is found. Any sort of contact with the heteronormative world is cut off — in fact, they’ll fight tooth and nail to keep recruits in their clutches and away from their family. And since they’re immoral and not “normal”, they must of course drink heavily, take drugs, and make out right in public. They actively recruit members to join their side, turning straight people gay, and clearly don’t even live in reality (“Dunia kita dunia fantasi!” declares Nazirah.)
This made me wonder, who are all of these characters based upon then? I have a lovely variety of gay friends, none of whom hit on me more than straight men do, and are tax-paying, valuable members of society who haven’t littered a day in their lives. When asked what his references were, Rahman Adam mentioned “newspaper reports, write-ups” and Irshad Manji’s Allah, Kebebasan & Cinta, which he admitted to only reading the synopsis. He also states that several actors in his play are gay themselves, and that he sat down with them to interview them about their lives. (Said actors were unavailable for comment.)

Jamal attempts to infiltrate the Kelab LGBT as a gay man, but is repulsed when a gay man tries to massage his shoulders.
So, from what I can gather, it’s either the lives of non-heterosexuals in Malaysia are constantly full of debauchery and I’ve been conveniently shielded, or I’ve managed to make friends with the most well-adjusted people in KL who happen to also be queers.
The worst technical fault of all, was that this wasn’t even a musical by the most loose of definitions. Having a few dance numbers and 2 songs does not a musical make. While Istana Budaya’s trend may be to stage musicals, it was perhaps best left as a straight-up play instead of inserting musical inaccuracies. Case in point: the very first song they dance to is Papa Roach’s “Last Resort”, which to my extensive musical knowledge is mostly enjoyed by straight men. More pseudo metal songs came up, interspersed with Brazilian club music, and a few Middle-Eastern sounding numbers that were danced to by Istana Budaya dancers. The only musical part of it that was relatively decent was Nani’s lipsynced ballad at the end, voiced by a nameless “student from Aswara” who had decent range and emotional drive. Here’s a pro-tip: if you want to be “properly” stereotypical, put on an ’80s pop number, KD Lang, or something from a Broadway musical. I, along with my gay friends, would have found that much more believable.
When asked after the show if the play covered as much about the subject of LGBTs as it could, Dato Jalaluddin admits to his credit that there were “a lot of things that need to be identified [about the subject of LGBTs]” and that “a lot of things need to be revised, so we really tackle the subject in a manner that everybody understands.” Rahman Adam himself has stated that the script will be reviewed so as to construct its content more coherently. These revisions will happen before Asmara Songsang goes on a tour of local public universities within the next month or so.

At the end, the three lead actors of LGBT roles take turns to memberi nasihat kepada penonton against LGBT behaviour. Led by Najua P Ramlee (center), the audience chants “1Malaysia” a few times.
On that note, student access to such a propaganda-filled show should also be carefully done. The night I was there, a large section of the audience was taken up by teenagers from a secondary school in Bangi. One of the boys, S, mentioned that those in school could be “terpengaruh dengan budaya luar, tapi dengan adanya teater ni, kita lebih tau ‘Oh, macam ni rupanya’.” [influenced by foreign cultures, but with this show, we now know what the (LGBT) world is like.] Again, I reiterate. This isn’t what it’s like, not the entire “culture” (as they put it) as a whole. This is as narrow-minded and bigoted a view as one could get. It’s tough to be queer when you’re young in most circumstances. They need people to talk with, not be preached to immediately that this is wrong, wrong, wrong.
If they want LGBTs to listen to their message, they need to listen to what the LGBT community has to say as well.
If they want LGBTs to listen to their message, they need to listen to what the LGBT community has to say as well. I would be less reluctant to accept this play if there was equal space for all sides to voice their concerns, whether in this play itself or in other avenues. Discrimination against queers is already bad enough without adding fire and brimstone — dialogue should and has to be encouraged. LGBTs do not have the same access to the same deep pockets as this performance did, thus have less opportunities to tell their side of the story.
While I admire anybody’s conviction for a cause and respect their right to believe in it, I simply wished that the folks behind Asmara Songsang did much more research into every aspect that went into this “anti-LGBT musical”. I sincerely hope the script revisions will reflect proper research, because this simply wasn’t enjoyable as a musical, funny as a comedy, nor an accurate portrayal of queers as a whole. ∗
Alia Ali is a writer and music teacher. She was a member of Jabatan Kebudayaan’s Tunas Budaya and Koir Kanak-Kanak Kebangsaan programs in the mid-90s.
Recent Posts
Malaysian Shakespeare: The Merry Wives of Windsor
We are deeply skeptical of Shakespeare. Even though we have been told that he is the world’s best playwright, we suspect that he is overrated…
A possible revolution
The idea: Get a whole group of college-aged theater actors and enthusiasts together. Put on shows that you would like to perform and what people want to see. Yang penting sekali, semangat kena tinggi.
M.Butterfly: When is a play not a play?
The M.Butterfly lecture performance by Rumah Anak Teater was very roughly defined but daring and exciting.. What better way to talk about lies than to hit the audience in the face with one?
Musical, Reviews Posts
Malaysian Shakespeare: The Merry Wives of Windsor
We are deeply skeptical of Shakespeare. Even though we have been told that he is the world’s best playwright, we suspect that he is overrated…
A possible revolution
The idea: Get a whole group of college-aged theater actors and enthusiasts together. Put on shows that you would like to perform and what people want to see. Yang penting sekali, semangat kena tinggi.
M.Butterfly: When is a play not a play?
The M.Butterfly lecture performance by Rumah Anak Teater was very roughly defined but daring and exciting.. What better way to talk about lies than to hit the audience in the face with one?
Tagged: Alia Ali, Asmara Songsang, Azra Communication, Fatin Nur Afifah, homophobia, Istana Budaya, Jalaluddin Hassan, Julia Ziegler, Kamal Adli, Kementerian Penerangan, Komunikasi dan Kebudayaan, Lambang Sari, LGBT, Lokman Ghani, Najua P Ramlee, Norazman Huasain Sahib Marican, queer, Radhi Khalid, Rahman Adam, Razak Ahmad, Suhaimi Md Zin, Thrive Edition, transphobia



A friend of mine shared with me this article when I told her how intrigued I was to watch this highly publicised theater.
The reason for my curiosity is to see the representation of the society that has been labeled as LGBT and how do people use art to educate on this sensitive matter. I guess for others it seems natural to automatically associate being LGBT with drugs, inappropriate public display of affection, clubbing, excessive smoking & drinking, loud insensitive choices of music and perverted sex, even though some of us may not even know anyone who is within that circle of individual.
The interpretations of substance for the theater were done merely from interviews of a few and based on a book and what have been reported in the newspaper. However please remember many reports only paint the negative side of the society but never the positive one, which creates a gap in truly understanding and knowing who they are, who we are.
This is merely my opinion, the writing of this article shows the areas of improvement that should be focused by the director such as the misrepresentation of the characters, the loose and predictable story line and the hijacking of political views in art. All are issue on their own. In the words of Margaret Mead “Children must be taught how to think, not what to think”.
I doubt it that many of the heteros here thrashing this play are truly homo-friendly. More like jumping on the bandwagon.
Only in Malaysia could such an ignorant and uninformed script coupled with downright hatred find it’s way onto a public stage. Only in Malaysia is the state proud of their uniqueness and ability to fund a creation of something so shameful, and immature. So carry on enjoying it as only you can Malaysia! The rest of us will give it a miss, and see you for what you are!
Shamed to be Malaysian.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/mar/28/anti-gay-lgbt-musical-malaysia
I was so shamed, even my friends in UK asked me is this true.
Being a gay is NOT A CRIME OR OFFENSE !
PLEASE !
A boy loves his dad, GAY ?
A girl loves her mom, LESBIAN ?
A classmate loves another classmate, HOMOSEXUAL ?
Homosexual is NOT WRONG, it is the same concept as heterosexual !
PLEASE,
Malaysia have so much crime activities,
why you all didn’t have “anti-crime musical tours” ?!!!
Instead of infringing human rights ?
I really want to say,
you are making Malaysian’s image worst.
God creates us, and even god didn’t say anything about homosexual is wrong
Then how could you conclude that homosexual is a offense ?!!
STOP RUINING MALAYSIAN’S IMAGE !
Asmara Songsang is a shame. A fascist guided policy in attempting to portray any group, that’s different to the advertised norm, as being wrong for ‘not being heterosexual’.
Which next? Being Penan?
May lightning strike the production.
Thanks for posting this. I try and promote Malaysia as a beautiful place to visit, but this sort of thing turns it so ugly, and dangerous for LGBT visitors. It’s such a shame.
I guess the government logic here is that stereotypical homosexuals have higher tendencies to watch plays and musicals. Hence, this anti-gay ‘initiative’ would be a highly targeted ‘cure’ as far as I can possibly conclude. As if the endorsed guidelines to identify LGBTs weren’t enough. However, it is also fair to note that it isn’t exactly clear as in to what extent LGBT rights are to be achieved in Malaysia. It may be as varied as to being understood all the way to legalizing same-sex marriages which at this point of time would be completely impossible. It is sad that these issues are not publicly discussed other than being simply dismissed for fear of deviating from religion. Anyways, thanks for the post.Very well written.
Thank you for a well-written review. I can’t believe this play got the green light (let alone mandated), and i disagree with your stance that ‘everybody has the right to say what they want’ — even if it preaches hatred, but i appreciate the thought and care you put in to it. It couldn’t have been easy.
This country has yet to realise that the LGBT “community” (what community? We’re isolated and face fear and bigotry from every direction) is not a ‘social problem’. Bigotry is. What, we don’t have enough imaginary enemies that we have to go after gays too because it makes us feel better about our manhoods?
What, no state mandated musicals about rape and incest? No fictional Kelab Perogol who get struck by lightning? Oh right… because that’s not songsang… they’re god-fearing straight men who just lost their way.
You could not have said this better.
This is touring schools?!?!?! where are the ngo responses to this?
i don’t agree the review ignores facts. Without this interview in the first place many of us wouldn’t know that the musical was “state sponsored hate and all the content was purposefully wrong to promote anti-LGBT propaganda” at all. correct me if im wrong but this is the only thing online calling it exactly that.
They didn’t do their research but i think even if they do it won’t change anything……
I have reported this”play” to Human Rights Watch in New York, as well as the Huffington Post and the Sydney Morning Herald. It’s an offensive breach of human rights against the LGBT community in Malaysia,to be promoting an irrational fear of and hatred towards a group of people / society that is so little understood and greatly marginalised by the general Malaysian population. Touring the country for free as well, with teenagers making up a large part of the audience! Shame on you, Rahman Adam.
Thank you. We hear journos from Reuters, Channel News 4 and Guardian have also picked up the story from here.
Thank you so much… Let’s see how they are going to cover it when it goes worldwide…
This review totally ignores the fact that the musical was state sponsored hate and all the content was purposefully wrong to promote anti-LGBT propaganda. There is no sense in hoping in better ‘revisions’ or ‘if only they did more research then it could be better”. They DID do their research and this is exactly what they wanted to say.
“they need to listen to what the LGBT community has to say as well.”
If the creators did this, Asmara Songsang will be a musical about a bucket of crabs.
Well done to Alia and Kakiseni for a fair and ethical review.
My parents are traditional and religious and had not many problems with Asmara Songsang in the beginning but this article helped me change their minds. i wanted to say thank you to Alia Ali.
All Malaysia needs now is a few nuclear warheads – then we can compete with North Korea to see whose government is more authoritarian and parochial.
Hey. well written. after I watched Asmara Songsang on the 2nd march, I feel like writing or commenting something about the play.
I don’t like calling myself a pengkid, I would say that I’m an andro, and I feel that u need to do a research, u really need to know the issue before u wanna speak up bout it. In Asmara Songsang, I can say that there’s no research done at all. even if I’m an andro, I can call myself a good citizen. I’m not like those potrayed in the play. And I believed most of us are better than some ‘straight’ people out there. I have a lot more to say and share,but using my blackberry is such a potong stim la. hehe. I wish I could share more. thanx a lot for this.
Thank you for your feedback. We would actually love to hear more opinions from those who watched the musical in this comments section.
We’re putting up more content related to this production and getting a sense of the audience’s reaction will be helpful.
I knew it! School kids and other people who doesn’t have any LGBT friends will assume that this is the real life of our kind of people after watching this stereotype show.
They are going to make a tour in malaysia with this kind of […] show. damn… it will make people think more negatively about us. who’s drinking? smoking? and having a low life like that? we all have our own high social circle. duhh
Yup. agree with u. I’m kinda disappointed to see so much wrong ‘information’ spread during the show.
I’m using my own self as an example. I might look like this (dyke) but I couldn’t relate to any of the role in the show. I love my country, I joined #DudukDiamUntukGaza and I’m a registered volunteer. I even have my own volunteer project to help the homeless people. not only me,but a lot of my circle of friends are doing the same thing too. so,where are ‘US’ in the play? why are they only portraying the bad ones? this is wrong, man..
Really interesting and disturbing. I live in London and read this through a link on Gay Star News. Alia’s response to the (harsh) criticism strikes me as wise in what seems a very hostile and reactionary society……. Good luck to all gay people there: come to London!
Well said. Well written. Thank you.
Alia Ali’s poorly written, tedious review of Malaysia’s latest “propagandic” musical, Asmara Songsang. I wonder how she would have responded to an American minstrel show, or a Nazi piece from the 1930′s with hook-nosed miserly Jews. She tries to be objective about a “musical” that spreads lies and hatred about a minority — and makes herself almost as stupid as the work she is reviewing.
This evil play is crafted to encourage young people to ostracize and bully young gay kids. It is hateful from curtain to curtain. The fact that it is being performed in the Istana Budaya with quasi-government sponsership is obscene. If the minority it was stereotyping, denigrating and lampooning was the Chinese, there would be a response from politicians. But gays have no defenders, no presence, no toleration in “One Malaysia”.
Kakiseni should be ashamed of itself for publishing this tripe.
I, as editor of this website, fully stand behind my writer and the content of this article. To be accused of objectivity is no shame for any publication.
I think Alia Ali has taken a difficult task and executed it well; communicating to a general audience what has happened, what is problematic about it and what needs to be done.
Kakiseni is proud to publish this article, and hopes for more of the same good stuff from Alia.
Rey, thank you for reading. I apologize that my objectivity has rankled you, and that my distaste for how this subject was presented wasn’t clear to you.
My intention is always to educate, not to harangue. I’ve been a teacher to mostly young children for 7 years and many of them are from the rigid side of the Malay Muslim community. I’ve grown up in a very large, very religious, very right-wing family with a sizable senior citizen age group. In my experience, no matter the age, changing Malay Muslim minds and perceptions is much more effective when done calmly and gently, over a long period of time. It’s not easy, I admit, but it’s the best way forward for me. It’s how I’ve come to approach complicated subjects like this with anybody.
This production was hateful and intolerant, I vehemently agree, and I probably could have done much more to reflect that. It would have been simpler to stomp all over this play and tear it apart from start to end. But I didn’t want to because the very people I want to reach – aforementioned rigid members of the public – wouldn’t have tried to understand or be interested in what I had to say. Religious and political indoctrination runs deep. I’m far from equipped to change their mindsets in a single theater review, but I can give them a starting point.
Cheers.
Dear Alia,
I love your review because of your honesty and context.
The fact of the matter is, homophobia in Malaysia is (currently) state-sponsored and this musical is one of its products. The fact of the matter is, it is offensive and you made that quite clear in your writing. The fact of the matter is, bigots in the arts will continue to produce hate; the question is whether we as audience have the sensible lens to see through it and the courage to call it out, as you have.
The fact of the matter is, there are those who fight for freedom, equality and justice who will walk all over you when you sing your own sound song of reason.
Kakiseni, congratulations for standing up for your writer. And thank you for publishing this review.
Miss alia, thanx for at least realising about this. I think our malaysian people are too judgemental. Even when I came to watch the show, there were lots of people looking at me as if I’m a criminal. so I can’t go watch the show if I wear mens’ formal attire? well,yeah.
I watched the show because I wanted to know how ‘normal’ people judge the lifestyle they have never known, never experienced.i I’s like how can a dyke suddenly become a gay-peng(salbiah-karimah) and the next minute become a real pengkid again? like, come on. Please do not show ur stupidity by doing something u don’t know.
Dear Alia–
Thanks for responding to my critique of your review. I understand your objective to educate a conservative public, but I don’t think your review served that purpose. Its “objective” tone belied the damage the play is capable of.
Imagine a play that condoned violence to women — one that portrayed men who commit that violence, who beat and degrade their wives and sisters, as heroes — blessed by god, and women who object as evil, egged on by evil opposition politicians.
Or a play in which “Babi Cina” were portrayed as vicious, scheming, transgressors who stole property from the simple, saintly Malays. At the end, the Chinese devils were struck down, justifiably, by bolts of lightning. And we all rejoice sing “One Malaysia”.
Would you write a similar review? “On the one hand . . .” “On the other . . .”
My point is that such “objectivity” is not really appropriate because the play itself is not a work of art, but a damaging work of propaganda. As someone who has spent his entire life in theatre, I find it deeply offensive that the stage is being used to harm innocent people and that the trappings of “art” are being subverted to the service of bigotry and hate.
This performance took place in the “Palace of Culture”. It had the power of Barisan behind it. Anyone familiar with history would place it in the same category as the works produced under the worst dictators (I won’t name them). To me, they are not worthy of respect.
Having directed in Malaysia, I have seen, and experienced the heavy hand of the government. I have heard my fellow artists council restraint in the face of censorship, over and over. What was the result? A genuine diminution in the quality of what was produced until the KL theatre scene became a shadow of its former self.
When artists with something to say are stymied while “artistes” who kowtow to power are encouraged and subsidized, the result is what we have now.
Malaysia’s best artists no longer produce challenging, controversial, relevant theatre that challenges received opinion. In fact, many no longer work here. One anodyne “musical” after another hits the boards. The new generation lacks the courage, and the will, to produce controversial, meaningful plays, and the stage is left to hacks like Rahman Adam.
As Yeats once put it, “The best lack all conviction, while the worst are full of passionate intensity.”
Cheers.
I feel certain that Mr Buono does not mean to say that any attempt at objectivity in a review must by default be misguided in an environment of general artistic prostitution. To demand this will be to place an unfair burden of activism on an individual reviewer, and moreover this shall have to be an activism of a kind that Mr Buono (or someone else–myself, for example) approves of.
If we take this path we shall in effect require that reviewers be no less propagandists than the creators and producers of the works under review, the difference being that those we consider “good” or “acceptable” reviewers are they who are morally obliged to our cause and not the opposing one. I believe that insisting on this is deeply unfair especially if our purpose is to oppose tyranny; for it will reduce criticism to a repulsive binary monotony; just as I feel likewise sure that one cannot fault a reviewer for indeed being that activist should he or she choose to be.
To this end I believe that one’s cause in this particular case will be better served not by an attack on this review but by the composition of another criticism of Asmara Songsang, which I trust Kakiseni will be pleased to publish.
I’m afraid the only thing your review succeeded at is to infuriate supporters of LGBT rights in Malaysia.
My biggest contention against your review is that you do not seem to realize what this play’s entire raison d’etre is. It is to demonize and spread hatred against the LGBT community, nothing more and nothing less. So how can you possibly say it would’ve been better if Rahman Adam had done more “research”? If he had actually spoken to LGBTs – if he had listened to them and begun to understand them – then this play would no longer exist. If this is all your review has to say, then it is inane and worthless.
You say it would’ve been easier to tear it apart. No, I think it would’ve been more courageous and more honest. You know how reprehensible it is. You are appalled and disgusted by it. Why did you not express this in your review? Why do you think your personal opinion does not belong in something as subjective as a theater review? There is no such thing as “objectivity” in art criticism; any attempt at such makes you dishonest and cowardly and, yes, inane.
You could have written something that rallied Malaysians to a cause you yourself believe in. You could’ve shone a light on the evil that has infested the arts scene of which you are a part. And you could have done so in your full capacity as a writer and a theater critic. You could have taken a principled stand in your writing. How often does the average person, just doing her job, get the opportunity to make a stand for what she believes in? You had that opportunity.
Instead, what you wrote says two things to the LGBT community: 1) Your government still hates and fears you, and 2) those who claim to be your friends and allies, still aren’t willing to take a stand with you.
Thank you for your feedback. I believe Alia has taken the opportunity to stand up for what she believes in — the only reason you can know she is appalled and disgusted by it is if her review made that clear. That, and her review also clearly points out that this ‘musical’ is a state-funded propaganda piece that unfairly speaks out against the LGBT community, to an audience that shouldn’t be hearing it.
And as for objectivity in art criticism, that was required of her by her editor. Saya lah. And I will add this: to say there is no subjectivity in reviews would indeed be ridiculous. But to then assume that reviews cannot therefore have any objectivity would also be inaccurately presumptuous.
Good sir, by all means be bored of this review, but:
1) to call the writer either dishonest or cowardly is, in this case, an uncalled for attack; and also not the kind of review I would allow.
2) I throw the same back to you. Instead of writing a comment that attacked the writer, you could have written something that rallied Malaysians to a cause you believe in. You could have shone a light on the evil that has infested the arts scene. You can do that any day in this modern age of communications, at any time. But instead, this is what we have — an angry comment.
Still, in your case, there is plenty of room left for you to say what you think of plays such as this. And as Mr U-En Ng pointed out in an earlier comment, one’s cause in this particular case will be better served not by an attack on this review but by the composition of another criticism of Asmara Songsang. And Yes, Kakiseni Blog will be pleased to publish any such letters (less than 1,000 words please). I extend an offer to you — if you have something to say about Asmara Songsang, and would like to contribute in this space, the address is editor@kakiseni.com.
“There is no such thing as “objectivity” in art criticism; any attempt at such makes you dishonest and cowardly and, yes, inane.”
With respect, I believe that the paintings you will find on the following site suck. http://www.museumofbadart.org/collection/
This is an opinion which I believe to be based in an objective assessment of what currently constitutes good taste. Tastes change, surely, but while they reign they reign supreme; and the basis of this judgement lies in the intersubjective constitution of the Lebenswelt that results, in this particular case, in the judgement that the paintings suck. One is free to believe and assert that they do not, in fact, suck, but one also lives in a world in which such a belief and assertion cannot exist in isolation if one wishes to participate in some form of social discourse. By all means insist that they do not suck, but to do so is to rely on the same right to opinion as the reviewer.
“You could have taken a principled stand in your writing. How often does the average person, just doing her job, get the opportunity to make a stand for what she believes in?”
Every day. I have resigned from a senior newspaper position on a matter of principle, and I went from dining well to dining on Maggi Mee in an instant. Since that time I have had ample opportunity to do so again. And I have. And I still dine on Maggi Mee.
“Instead, what you wrote says two things to the LGBT community: 1) Your government still hates and fears you, and 2) those who claim to be your friends and allies, still aren’t willing to take a stand with you.”
Well, that’s true, ennit?
I disagree with Ray that this play is “evil,” but I agree that Alia was far to kind to this production than she needed to be. In softening her criticism of this awful production, she has made it sound better than it is.
If her intent was to educate rather than to harangue, it may have been useful to list down the LGBT stereotypes that are perpetuated by this production. LGBTs are a western disease? Check. LGBTs are promiscuous? Check. LGBTs use drugs recreationally? Check. The list goes on. Drawing attention to these stereotypes and exposing them for the hollow, ignorant prejudices they are would have been instructive.
I am especially horrified by Jalalludin Hasan’s quote. It revealed no understanding of how one-sided and biases the production was. They “really tackle the subject in a manner that everybody understands,” and that’s part of the problem. It sounds like Alia is saying that Jalalludin understands that the play is only one of many interpretations of LGBT communities. But he’s really offering a defense for the production as-is. I don’t see why we should credit him for this.
It’s nice that Alia ends the review on an optimistic note, by putting faith in the production to get it right when the show starts to tour. But if their research is so off-base the first time, if the production perpetuated stereotypes instead of overcoming them the first time, it’s no use.
I could not have invented better excuses to get nasty. And I don’t see how a well-executed hatchet piece would have alienated the public (the very people she hopes to reach). If you turn it into an us vs. them proposition (look what stupid things normal people think), then yes it could feed the trolls. She would have to be systematic and fair about this production. She would have to discuss specifics of the poor characterization instead of sweeping them under the carpet.
what’s wrong with this country that a play like this is given out for free?!
“research done was so poor — yet presented so conclusively.”
“This is as narrow-minded and bigoted a view as one could get. It’s tough to be queer when you’re young in most circumstances. They need people to talk with, not be preached to immediately that this is wrong, wrong, wrong.”
“If they want LGBTs to listen to their message, they need to listen to what the LGBT community has to say as well.”
Well written. Thank you, I enjoyed it.